She Has a Seat at the Table. She’s Leaving Anyway.
Recently I talked with a woman I coached about a year ago. She had a seat at the table, and she wanted to use it for something that mattered. This year she reached out to re-engage…
Read more
In today’s fast-paced work environment, teams are expected to deliver top-notch results while maintaining agility and creativity. Based on my experience working with teams and team leaders, many teams fail to reach their potential, not because of a lack of talent or resources but because they haven’t established the critical foundations of trust and psychological safety.
Trust and psychological safety are often used interchangeably, but they are distinct concepts that complement each other.
Trust is personal. It’s the decision to make something that you value vulnerable to another person, with confidence that their intentions are good. It’s about knowing you don’t have to be overly protective or careful in your interactions with others. [Feltman, 2021]
Psychological safety, on the other hand, is a team dynamic. It’s the collective environment that allows individuals to feel comfortable being themselves, sharing ideas, and making mistakes without fear of judgment or reprisal. In a psychologically safe team, people believe they will be given the benefit of the doubt, supported by their peers, and encouraged to take risks, ask for help, or think differently.
Google’s Project Aristotle sheds light on the critical importance of psychological safety in building high-performing teams. The study found that it’s not about who is on the team but about how the team works together. Teams with psychological safety are more likely to hold each other to high standards, showcase dependability, and make decisions with clarity and confidence. These elements help individuals feel that their work has personal meaning and impact, driving both individual and collective success.
The findings from Project Aristotle align closely with the insights from Patrick Lencioni’s The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. According to Lencioni, the absence of trust is the root cause of dysfunction in teams. Without trust, team members avoid conflict, leading to artificial harmony where real issues are never addressed. This avoidance of conflict results in a lack of commitment to decisions, an unwillingness to hold each other accountable, and ultimately, a focus on individual rather than team results.
As Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “Our distrust is very expensive.”
Investing in trust and psychological safety isn’t just about improving team morale—there are distinct, measurable benefits to an organization when these elements are prioritized:
Creating a team culture that fosters trust and psychological safety doesn’t happen overnight, but it’s essential for long-term success. By prioritizing vulnerability, open communication, and empathy, leaders can lay the groundwork for trust to flourish. From there, psychological safety can take root, empowering teams to innovate, collaborate, and thrive.
As both Google’s research and Lencioni’s framework suggest, trust is the bedrock upon which psychological safety is built. Without it, teams will struggle to have the honest conversations and healthy conflicts that lead to growth. With trust, teams can embrace the kind of collaboration that fuels innovation and drives high performance.
In today’s competitive landscape, creating this environment is no longer optional—it’s essential. Teams that invest in trust and psychological safety are the ones that will not only meet expectations but exceed them, time and time again.
Recently I talked with a woman I coached about a year ago. She had a seat at the table, and she wanted to use it for something that mattered. This year she reached out to re-engage…
Read more
When I was a kid, I loved imaginary play. There was an entire summer when I was obsessed with the show “Flipper,” and I spent my mornings pretending I had a pet dolphin. But at som…
Read more
I’ve been thinking about AI a lot recently. Which isn’t news, because who isn’t? But what I keep coming back to is leadership. Specifically, what AI demands of the humans still in …
Read moreBook a free discovery call to see if working with Suzanne is right for you.